BILL NUMBER: SB 406	CHAPTERED  07/07/00

	CHAPTER   92
	FILED WITH SECRETARY OF STATE   JULY 7, 2000
	PASSED THE SENATE   JUNE 29, 2000
	PASSED THE ASSEMBLY   JUNE 22, 2000
	AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY   JUNE 16, 2000
	AMENDED IN SENATE   MAY 24, 1999
	AMENDED IN SENATE   APRIL 6, 1999

INTRODUCED BY   Senator Ortiz

                        FEBRUARY 12, 1999

   An act to add Section 14556.40 to the Government Code, relating to
transportation.

      (Approved by Governor July 6, 2000.  Filed with
Secretary of State July 7, 2000.)

   I am signing Senate Bill No. 406, which corrects certain
provisions of AB 2928, a comprehensive transportation funding measure
which incorporates most of the proposals I made for almost $5
billion in congestion relief, transportation system connectivity and
goods movement projects.  This bill contains the same list of project
funding allocations, with a few modifications, as is contained in AB
2928.  I am taking identical veto actions on projects in this bill
that I took when signing AB 2928.
   I am reducing or eliminating certain appropriations made in
Section 6 of the bill, which adds Chapter 4.5 (commencing with
Article 5, Section 14556.40) to Part 5.3 of Division 3 of Title 2 of
the Government Code, by a total of $93,800,000.  These expenditures
are being eliminated because I have specific concerns about the
projects and their priority for inclusion in this plan, and about the
precedent these projects would set with respect to state
expenditures.  Additionally, I am requesting that the Legislature
enact subsequent legislation to correct certain technical defects in
this bill and modify the financing of the program to have less of an
impact on the State General Fund in future years.
   I am reducing the expenditures in Chapter 4.5, Article 5, Section
14556.40, subsection (a) of the Government Code by eliminating or
reducing the following paragraphs:
   Paragraph (120) is eliminated, which allocates $1,500,000 to Yuba
County for the Yuba Airport runway extension and associated
improvements.  This project is not a congestion relief project
affecting most travelers in the area..
   Paragraph (125) is eliminated, which allocates $5,000,000 to the
Orange County Transportation Authority for the Route 57 toll road
environmental impact report and study for expansion project.  The
franchise agreement for this project prohibits use of state funds in
this fashion.
   Paragraph (130) is eliminated, which allocates $3,500,000 to the
City of Garden Grove for the Route 22; connector to the interchange
with I-405.  Over $206 million for Route 22 is already included in
Paragraph (70).
   Paragraph (131) is eliminated, which allocates $800,000 to the
town of Apple Valley for the Bear Valley Road closure project and
Kasota Road safety redesign.  Funding for this project may be
available in the State Highway Operations and Preservation Program
and through local street and road funding.
   Paragraph (132) is eliminated, which allocates $7,000,000 to Los
Angeles County for the Fairway Drive grade separation project in the
San Gabriel Valley.  This project already has access to several
funding sources through the Alameda Corridor East Project.
   Paragraph (136) is eliminated, which allocates $3,500,000 to City
of Palmdale for the widening of Avenue S; between Route 14 and Route
138.  This project does not appear to provide significant congestion
relief or to fit other priorities for use of these funds.
   Paragraph (137) is eliminated, which allocates $5,500,000 to City
of Lancaster for improvements to the Fox Field Industrial Corridor.
This project does not appear to provide significant congestion relief
or to fit other priorities for use of these funds.
   Paragraph (138) is reduced by $3,000,000 to $4,000,000, which
allocates funds to the Cross Valley Rail Corridor Joint Powers
Authority for the upgrade of railroad track from Visalia to Huron.
This project mainly funds improvements to rail lines that will be
used by short line freight rail. Although I recognize that this
project may provide significant local goods movement capacity, I
expect local and railroad funds to provide the majority of funding.
   Paragraph (142) is reduced by $1,500,000 to $2,000,000 for the
City of West Hollywood for the repair, maintenance, and mitigation of
Santa Monica Boulevard.  A portion this project appears to be
eligible for the street and road maintenance funding provided in this
measure.
   Paragraph (143) is eliminated, which allocates $1,900,000 to the
Capital Corridor Joint Powers Authority for the expansion of
Intercity rail service between San Jose, Oakland, and the Sacramento
region.  Such service cannot be implemented this year, and the
ongoing operating costs should be funded from the Public
Transportation Account in due course.
   Paragraph (144) is reduced by $45,000,000 to $5,000,000 for the
Golden Gate Bridge Highway and Transportation District for the
seismic retrofit of the Golden Gate Bridge.  It is my understanding
that other funding sources are available, and Caltrans will be
working with the District to assist in securing federal funding for
this project.
   Paragraph (147) is eliminated, which allocates $7,000,000 to the
Imperial Valley Association of Governments for the reconstruction of
the I-8/Imperial Avenue interchange.  This project does not appear to
provide significant congestion relief or to fit other priorities for
use of these funds.
   Paragraph (155) is eliminated, which allocates $8,600,000 to the
City of Chula Vista to acquire right-of-way, build, and operate a
10-mile limited access toll facility from San Miguel Road to Otay
Mesa Road and conduct a due diligence review, including an
independent appraisal of the feasibility of acquisition by a public
agency of the Route 125 franchise agreement authorized under Section
143 of the Streets and Highways Code.  I do not support state funding
for the acquisition of a private toll road franchise.

                                                 GRAY DAVIS, Governor


	LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST


   SB 406, Ortiz.   Transportation.
   Existing law requires the California Transportation Commission, in
conjunction with the Department of Transportation, transportation
planning agencies, county transportation commissions, and
transportation authorities, to develop a 4-year state transportation
improvement program for purposes of planning the appropriation and
allocation of available transportation funds to state, regional, and
local transportation projects, including a 4-year process for
estimating the amount of state and federal funds to be available for
those transportation projects.
   The bill would establish a list of transportation projects
eligible for funding with money from the Traffic Congestion Relief
Fund established by AB 2928 and would specify the lead agency for
each project.


THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:


  SECTION 1.  Section 14556.40 is added to the Government Code, to
read:
   14556.40.  (a) The following projects are eligible for grants from
the Traffic Congestion Relief Fund, established by Assembly Bill No.
2928 of the 1999-2000 Regular Session, for the purposes and amounts
specified:
   (1) BART to San Jose; extend BART from Fremont to Downtown San
Jose in Santa Clara and Alameda Counties.  Seven hundred twenty-five
million dollars ($725,000,000).  The lead applicant is the Santa
Clara County Valley Transportation Authority.
   (2) Fremont-South Bay Commuter Rail; acquire rail line and start
commuter rail service between Fremont and San Jose in Santa Clara and
Alameda Counties.  Thirty-five million dollars ($35,000,000).  The
lead applicant is the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority.
   (3) Route 101; widen freeway from four to eight lanes south of San
Jose, Bemal Road to Burnett Avenue in Santa Clara County.
Twenty-five million dollars ($25,000,000).  The lead applicant is the
department or the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority.
   (4) Route 680; add northbound HOV lane over Sunol Grade, Milpitas
to Route 84 in Santa Clara and Alameda Counties.  Sixty million
dollars ($60,000,000).  The lead applicant is the department or the
Alameda County Congestion Management Agency.
   (5) Route 101; add northbound lane to freeway through San Jose,
Route 87 to Trimble Road in Santa Clara County.  Five million dollars
($5,000,000).  The lead applicant is the department or the Santa
Clara Valley Transportation Authority.
   (6) Route 262; major investment study for cross connector freeway,
Route 680 to Route 880 near Warm Springs in Santa Clara County.  One
million dollars ($1,000,000).  The lead applicant is the department
or the Metropolitan Transportation Commission.
   (7) Caltrain; expand service to Gilroy; improve parking, stations,
and platforms along UPRR line in Santa Clara County.  Fifty-five
million dollars ($55,000,000).  The lead applicant is Santa Clara
Valley Transportation Authority.
   (8) Route 880; reconstruct Coleman Avenue Interchange near San
Jose Airport in Santa Clara County.  Five million dollars
($5,000,000).  The lead applicant is the department or the Santa
Clara Valley Transportation Authority.
   (9) Capitol Corridor; improve intercity rail line between Oakland
and San Jose, and at Jack London Square and Emeryville stations in
Alameda and Santa Clara Counties.  Twenty-five million dollars
($25,000,000).  The lead applicant is the department or the Capitol
Corridor Joint Powers Authority.
   (10) Regional Express Bus; acquire low-emission buses for new
express service on HOV lanes regionwide.  In nine counties.  Forty
million dollars ($40,000,000).  The lead applicant is the
Metropolitan Transportation Commission.
   (11) San Francisco Bay Southern Crossing; complete feasibility and
financial studies for new San Francisco Bay crossing (new bridge,
HOV/Transit bridge or second BART tube) in Alameda and San Francisco
or San Mateo Counties.  Five million dollars ($5,000,000).  The lead
applicant is the department or the Metropolitan Transportation
Commission.
   (12) Bay Area Transit Connectivity; complete studies of, and fund
related improvements for, the I-580 Livermore Corridor; West Contra
Costa County and Route 4 Corridors in Alameda and Contra Costa
Counties.  Seventeen million dollars ($17,000,000).  The lead
applicant for the I-580 study is the Alameda County Congestion
Management Agency; and the Contra Costa Transportation Authority is
the lead applicant for the West Contra Costa and Route 4 studies.
   (13) CalTrain Peninsula Corridor; acquire rolling stock, add
passing tracks, and construct pedestrian access structure at stations
between San Francisco and San Jose in San Francisco, San Mateo, and
Santa Clara Counties.  One hundred twenty-seven million dollars
($127,000,000).  The lead applicant is the Peninsula Joint Powers
Board.
   (14) CalTrain; extension to Salinas in Monterey County.  Twenty
million dollars ($20,000,000).  The lead applicant is the
Transportation Agency for Monterey County.
   (15) Route 24; Caldecott Tunnel; add fourth bore tunnel with
additional lanes in Alameda and Contra Costa Counties.  Twenty
million dollars ($20,000,000).  The lead applicant is the department
or the Metropolitan Transportation Commission.
   (16) Route 4; construct one or more phases of improvements to
widen freeway to eight lanes from Railroad through Loveridge Road,
including two high-occupany vehicle lanes, and to six or more lanes
from east of Loveridge Road through Hillcrest.  Thirty-nine million
dollars ($39,000,000).  The lead applicant is the Contra Costa
Transportation Authority.
   (17) Route 101; add reversible HOV lane through San Rafael, Sir
Francis Drake Boulevard to North San Pedro Road in Marin County.
Fifteen million dollars ($15,000,000).  The lead applicant is the
department or the Marin Congestion Management Agency.
   (18) Route 101; widen eight miles of freeway to six lanes, Novato
to Petaluma (Novato Narrows) in Marin and Sonoma Counties.
Twenty-one million dollars ($21,000,000).  The lead applicant is the
department or the Sonoma County Transportation Authority.
   (19) Bay Area Water Transit Authority; establish a regional water
transit system beginning with Treasure Island in the City and County
of San Francisco.  Two million dollars ($2,000,000).  The lead
applicant is the Bay Area Water Transit Authority.
   (20) San Francisco Muni Third Street Light Rail; extend Third
Street line to Chinatown (tunnel) in the City and County of San
Francisco.  One hundred forty million dollars ($140,000,000).  The
lead applicant is the Municipal Transportation Agency.
   (21) San Francisco Muni Ocean Avenue Light Rail; reconstruct Ocean
Avenue light rail line to Route 1 near California State University,
San Francisco, in the City and County of San Francisco.  Seven
million dollars ($7,000,000).  The lead applicant is the Municipal
Transportation Agency.
   (22) Route 101; environmental study for reconstruction of Doyle
Drive, from Lombard St./Richardson Avenue to Route 1 Interchange in
City and County of San Francisco.  Fifteen million dollars
($15,000,000).  The lead applicant is the department or the San
Francisco County Transportation Authority.
   (23) CalTrain Peninsula Corridor; complete grade separations at
Poplar Avenue in (Burlingame), 25th Avenue (San Mateo), and Linden
Avenue (South San Francisco) in San Mateo County.  Fifteen million
dollars ($15,000,000).  The lead applicant is the San Mateo County
Transportation Authority.
   (24) Vallejo Baylink Ferry; acquire low-emission ferryboats to
expand Baylink Vallejo-San Francisco service in Solano County.  Five
million dollars ($5,000,000).  The lead applicant is the City of
Vallejo.
   (25) I-80/I-680/Route 12 Interchange in Fairfield in Solano
County; 12 interchange complex in seven stages (Stage 1).  Thirteen
million dollars ($13,000,000).  The lead applicant is the department
or the Solano Transportation Authority.
   (26) ACE Commuter Rail; add siding on UPRR line in Livermore
Valley in Alameda County.  One million dollars ($1,000,000).  The
lead applicant is the Alameda County Congestion Management Authority.

   (27) Vasco Road Safety and Transit Enhancement Project in Alameda
and Contra Costa Counties.  Eleven million dollars ($11,000,000).
The lead applicant is Alameda County Congestion Management Authority.

   (28) Parking Structure at Transit Village at Richmond BART Station
in Contra Costa County.  Five million dollars ($5,000,000).  The
lead applicant is the City of Richmond.
   (29) AC Transit; buy two fuel cell buses and fueling facility for
demonstration project in Alameda and Contra Costa Counties.  Eight
million dollars ($8,000,000).  The lead applicant is the Alameda
Contra Costa Transit District.
   (30) Implementation of commuter rail passenger service from
Cloverdale south to San Rafael and Larkspur in Marin and Sonoma
Counties.  Thirty-seven million dollars ($37,000,000).  The lead
applicant is the Sonoma-Marin Area Transit Authority.
   (31) Route 580; construct eastbound and westbound HOV lanes from
Tassajara Road/Santa Rita Road to Vasco Road in Alameda County.
Twenty-five million dollars ($25,000,000).  The lead applicant is the
department or the Alameda County Congestion Management Authority.
   (32) North Coast Railroad; repair and upgrade track to meet Class
II (freight) standards in Napa and Humboldt Counties.  Sixty million
dollars ($60,000,000).  The lead applicant is North Coast Rail
Authority.
   (33) Bus Transit; acquire low-emission buses for Los Angeles
County MTA bus transit service.  One hundred fifty million dollars
($150,000,000).  The lead applicant is the Los Angeles County
Metropolitan Transportation Authority.
   (34) Blue Line to Los Angeles; new rail line Pasadena to Los
Angeles in Los Angeles County.  Forty million dollars ($40,000,000).
The lead applicant is the Pasadena Metro Blue Line Construction
Authority.
   (35) Pacific Surfliner; triple track intercity rail line within
Los Angeles County and add run-through-tracks through Los Angeles
Union Station in Los Angeles County.  One hundred million dollars
($100,000,000).  The lead applicant is the department.
   (36) Los Angeles Eastside Transit Extension; build new light rail
line in East Los Angeles, from Union Station to Atlantic via 1st
Street to Lorena in Los Angeles County.  Two hundred thirty-six
million dollars ($236,000,000).  The lead applicant is the Los
Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority.
   (37) Los Angeles Mid-City Transit Improvements; build Bus Rapid
Transit system or Light Rail Transit in Mid-City/Westside/Exposition
Corridors in Los Angeles County.  Two hundred fifty-six million
dollars ($256,000,000).  The lead applicant is the Los Angeles County
Metropolitan Transportation Authority.
   (38) Los Angeles-San Fernando Valley Transit Extension; (A) build
an East-West Bus Rapid Transit system in the Burbank-Chandler
corridor, from North Hollywood to Warner Center.  One hundred
forty-five million dollars ($145,000,000).  (B) Build a North-South
corridor bus transit project that interfaces with the foregoing
East-West Burbank-Chandler corridor project and with the Ventura
Boulevard Rapid Bus project.  One hundred million dollars
($100,000,000).  The lead applicant for both extension projects is
the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority.
   (39) Route 405; add northbound HOV lane over Sepulveda Pass, Route
10 to Route 101 in Los Angeles County.  Ninety million dollars
($90,000,000).  The lead applicant is the department or the Los
Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority.
   (40) Route 10; add HOV lanes on San Bernardino Freeway over
Kellogg Hill, near Pomona, Route 605 to Route 57 in Los Angeles
County.  Ninety million dollars ($90,000,000).  The lead applicant is
the department or the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation
Authority.
   (41) Route 5; add HOV lanes on Golden State Freeway through San
Fernando Valley, Route 170 (Hollywood Freeway) to Route 14 (Antelope
Valley Freeway) in Los Angeles County.  Fifty million dollars
($50,000,000).  The lead applicant is the department or the Los
Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority.
   (42) Route 5; widen Santa Ana Freeway to 10 lanes (two HOV + two
mixed flow), Orange County line to Route 710, with related major
arterial improvements, in Los Angeles County.  One hundred
twenty-five million dollars ($125,000,000).  The lead applicant is
the department or the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation
Authority.
   (43) Route 5; improve Carmenita Road Interchange in Norwalk in Los
Angeles County.  Seventy-one million dollars ($71,000,000).  The
lead applicant is the department or the Los Angeles County
Metropolitan Transportation Authority.
   (44) Route 47 (Terminal Island Freeway); construct interchange at
Ocean Boulevard Overpass in the City of Long Beach in Los Angeles
County.  Eighteen million four hundred thousand dollars
($18,400,000).  The lead applicant is the Port of Long Beach.
   (45) Route 710; complete Gateway Corridor Study, Los Angeles/Long
Beach ports to Route 5 in Los Angeles County.  Two million dollars
($2,000,000).  The lead applicant is the department.
   (46) Route 1; reconstruct intersection at Route 107 in Torrance in
Los Angeles County.  Two million dollars ($2,000,000).  The lead
applicant is the department or the Los Angeles County Metropolitan
Transportation Authority.
   (47) Route 101; California Street off-ramp in Ventura County.
Fifteen million dollars ($15,000,000).  The lead applicant is the
department or the Ventura County Transportation Commission.
   (48) Route 101; corridor analysis and PSR to improve corridor from
Route 170 (North Hollywood Freeway) to Route 23 in Thousand Oaks
(Ventura County) in Los Angeles and Ventura Counties.  Three million
dollars ($3,000,000).  The lead applicant is the department.
   (49) Hollywood Intermodal Transportation Center; intermodal
facility at Highland Avenue and Hawthorn Avenue in the City of Los
Angeles.  Ten million dollars ($10,000,000).  The lead applicant is
the City of Los Angeles.
   (50) Route 71; complete three miles of six-lane freeway through
Pomona, from Route 10 to Route 60 in Los Angeles County.  Thirty
million dollars ($30,000,000).  The lead applicant is the department
or the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority.
   (51) Route 101/405; add auxiliary lane and widen ramp through
freeway interchange in Sherman Oaks in Los Angeles County.
Twenty-one million dollars ($21,000,000).  The lead applicant is the
department or the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation
Authority.
   (52) Route 405; add HOV and auxiliary lanes for 1 mile in West Los
Angeles, from Waterford Avenue to Route 10 in Los Angeles County.
Twenty-five million dollars ($25,000,000). The lead applicant is the
department or the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation
Authority.
   (53) Automated Signal Corridors (ATSAC); improve 479 automated
signals in Victory/Ventura Corridor, and add 76 new automated signals
in Sepulveda Boulevard and Route 118 Corridors in Los Angeles
County.  Sixteen million dollars ($16,000,000).  The lead applicant
is the City of Los Angeles.
   (54) Alameda Corridor East; build grade separations on BNSF and
UPRR lines, downtown Los Angeles to Los Angeles County line in Los
Angeles County.  One hundred fifty million dollars ($150,000,000).
The lead applicant is the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments.

   (55) Alameda Corridor East; build grade separations on UPRR line,
Los Angeles County line to Colton, with rail-to-rail separation at
Colton in San Bernardino County.  Ninety-five million dollars
($95,000,000).  The lead applicant is the San Bernardino Associated
Governments.
   (56) Metrolink; track and signal improvements on Metrolink; San
Bernardino line in San Bernardino County.  Fifteen million dollars
($15,000,000).  The lead applicant is the Southern California
Regional Rail Authority.
   (57) Route 215; add HOV lanes through downtown San Bernardino,
Route 10 to Route 30 in San Bernardino County.  Twenty-five million
dollars ($25,000,000).  The lead applicant is the department or the
San Bernardino County Transportation Commission.
   (58) Route 10; widen freeway to eight lanes through Redlands,
Route 30 to Ford Street in San Bernardino County.  Ten million
dollars ($10,000,000).  The lead applicant is the department or the
San Bernardino County Transportation Commission.
   (59) Route 10; Live Oak Canyon Interchange in the City of Yucaipa
in San Bernardino County.  Eleven million dollars ($11,000,000).  The
lead applicant is the department or the San Bernardino County
Transportation Commission.
   (60) Route 15; southbound truck climbing lane at two locations in
San Bernardino County.  Ten million dollars ($10,000,000).  The lead
applicant is the department or the San Bernardino County
Transportation Commission.
   (61) Route 10; reconstruct Apache Trail Interchange east of
Banning in Riverside County.  Thirty million dollars ($30,000,000).
The lead applicant is the department or the Riverside County
Transportation Commission.
   (62) Route 91; add HOV lanes through downtown Riverside, Mary
Street to Route 60/215 junction in Riverside County.  Forty million
dollars ($40,000,000).  The lead applicant is the department or the
Riverside County Transportation Commission.
   (63) Route 60; add seven miles of HOV lanes west of Riverside,
Route 15 to Valley Way in Riverside County.  Twenty-five million
dollars ($25,000,000).  The lead applicant is the department or the
Riverside County Transportation Commission.
   (64) Route 91; improve the Green River Interchange and add
auxiliary lane and connector ramp east of the Green River Interchange
to northbound Route 71 in Riverside County.  Five million dollars
($5,000,000).  The lead applicant is the department or the Riverside
County Transportation Commission.
   (70) Route 22; add HOV lanes on Garden Grove Freeway, Route I-405
to Route 55 in Orange County.  Two hundred six million five hundred
thousand dollars ($206,500,000).  The lead applicant is the
department or the Orange County Transportation Authority.
   (73) Alameda Corridor East; (Orangethorpe Corridor) build grade
separations on BNSF line, Los Angeles County line through Santa Ana
Canyon in Orange County.  Twenty-eight million dollars ($28,000,000).
  The lead applicant is the Orange County Transportation Authority.
   (74) Pacific Surfliner; double track intercity rail line within
San Diego County, add maintenance yard in San Diego County.
Forty-seven million dollars ($47,000,000).  The lead applicant is the
department or North Coast Transit District.
   (75) San Diego Transit Buses; acquire about 85 low-emission buses
for San Diego transit service in San Diego County.  Thirty million
dollars ($30,000,000).  The lead applicant is the San Diego
Metropolitan Transit Development Board.
   (76) Coaster Commuter Rail; acquire one new train set to expand
commuter rail in San Diego County.  Fourteen million dollars
($14,000,000).  The lead applicant is North County Transit District.

   (77) Route 94; complete environmental studies to add capacity to
Route 94 corridor, downtown San Diego to Route 125 in Lemon Grove in
San Diego County.  Twenty million dollars ($20,000,000).  The lead
applicant is the department or San Diego Association of Governments.

   (78) East Village access; improve access to light rail from new
in-town East Village development in San Diego County.  Fifteen
million dollars ($15,000,000).  The lead applicant is the San Diego
Metropolitan Transit Development Board.
   (79) North County Light Rail; build new 20-mile light rail line
from Oceanside to Escondido in San Diego County.  Eighty million
dollars ($80,000,000).  The lead applicant is North County Transit
District.
   (80) Mid-Coast Light Rail; extend Old Town light rail line 6 miles
to Balboa Avenue in San Diego County.  Ten million dollars
($10,000,000).  The lead applicant is the San Diego Metropolitan
Transit Development Board.
   (81) San Diego Ferry; acquire low-emission high-speed ferryboat
for new off-coast service between San Diego and Oceanside in San
Diego County.  Five million dollars ($5,000,000).  The lead applicant
is the San Diego Association of Governments.
   (82) Routes 5/805; reconstruct and widen freeway interchange,
Genesee Avenue to Del Mar Heights Road in San Diego County.
Twenty-five million dollars ($25,000,000).  The lead applicant is the
department or the San Diego Association of Governments.
   (83) Route 15; add high-tech managed lane on I-15 freeway north of
San Diego (Stage 1) from Route 163 to Route 78 in San Diego County.
Seventy million dollars ($70,000,000).  The lead applicant is the
department or the San Diego Association of Governments.
   (84) Route 52; build four miles of new six-lane freeway to Santee,
Mission Gorge to Route 67 in San Diego County.  Forty-five million
dollars ($45,000,000).  The lead applicant is the department or the
San Diego Association of Governments.
   (85) Route 56; construct approximately five miles of new freeway
alignment between I-5 and I-15 from Carmel Valley to Rancho
Penasquitos in the City of San Diego in San Diego County.
Twenty-five million dollars ($25,000,000).  The lead applicant is the
department or the San Diego Association of Governments.
   (86) Route 905; build new six-lane freeway on Otay Mesa, Route 805
to Mexico Port of Entry in San Diego County.  Twenty-five million
dollars ($25,000,000).  The lead applicant is the department or the
San Diego Association of Governments.
   (87) Routes 94/125; build two new freeway connector ramps at Route
94/125 in Lemon Grove in San Diego County.  Sixty million dollars
($60,000,000).  The lead applicant is the department or the San Diego
Association of Governments.
   (88) Route 5; realign freeway at Virginia Avenue, approaching San
Ysidro Port of Entry to Mexico in San Diego County.  Ten million
dollars ($10,000,000).  The lead applicant is the department or the
San Diego Association of Governments.
   (89) Route 99; improve Shaw Avenue Interchange in northern Fresno
in Fresno County.  Five million dollars ($5,000,000).  The lead
applicant is the department or the Council of Fresno County
Governments.
   (90) Route 99; widen freeway to six lanes, Kingsburg to Selma in
Fresno County.  Twenty million dollars ($20,000,000).  The lead
applicant is the department or the Council of Fresno County
Governments.
   (91) Route 180; build new expressway east of Clovis, Clovis Avenue
to Temperance Avenue in Fresno County.  Twenty million dollars
($20,000,000).  The lead applicant is the department or the Council
of Fresno County Governments.
   (92) San Joaquin Corridor; improve track and signals along San
Joaquin intercity rail line near Hanford in Kings County.  Ten
million dollars ($10,000,000).  The lead applicant is the department.

   (93) Route 180; complete environmental studies to extend Route 180
westward from Mendota to I-5 in Fresno County.  Seven million
dollars ($7,000,000).  The lead applicant is the department or the
Council of Fresno County Governments.
   (94) Route 43; widen to four-lane expressway from Kings County
line to Route 99 in Selma in Fresno County.  Five million dollars
($5,000,000).  The lead applicant is the department or the Council of
Fresno County Governments.
   (95) Route 41; add auxiliary lane/operational improvements and
improve ramps at Friant Road Interchange in Fresno in Fresno County.
Ten million dollars ($10,000,000).  The lead applicant is the
department or the Council of Fresno County Governments.
   (96) Friant Road; widen to four lanes from Copper Avenue to Road
206 in Fresno County.  Ten million dollars ($10,000,000).  The lead
applicant is the County of Fresno.
   (97) Operational improvements on Shaw Avenue, Chestnut Avenue,
Willow Avenue, and Barstow Avenue near California State University at
Fresno in Fresno County.  Ten million dollars ($10,000,000).  The
lead applicant is the Fresno County Transportation Authority.  Of the
amount authorized under this paragraph, the sum of two million
dollars ($2,000,000) shall be transferred to the California State
University at Fresno for the purposes of funding preliminary plans,
working drawings, or both of those, and related program management
costs for the Fresno Events Center.
   (98) Peach Avenue; widen to four-lane arterial and add pedestrian
overcrossings for three schools in Fresno County.  Ten million
dollars ($10,000,000).  The lead applicant is the City of Fresno.
   (99) San Joaquin Corridor; improve track and signals along San
Joaquin intercity rail line in seven counties.  Fifteen million
dollars ($15,000,000).  The lead applicant is the department.
   (100) San Joaquin Valley Emergency Clean Air Attainment Program;
incentives for the reduction of emissions from heavy-duty diesel
engines operating within the eight-county San Joaquin Valley region.
Twenty-five million dollars ($25,000,000).  The lead applicant is
the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District.
   (101) Santa Cruz Metropolitan Transit District bus fleet;
acquisition of low-emission buses.  Three million dollars
($3,000,000).  The lead applicant is the Santa Cruz Metropolitan
Transit District.
   (102) Route 101 access; State Street smart corridor Advanced
Traffic Corridor System (ATSC) technology in Santa Barbara County.
One million three hundred thousand dollars ($1,300,000).  The lead
applicant is the City of Santa Barbara.
   (103) Route 99; improve interchange at Seventh Standard Road,
north of Bakersfield in Kern County.  Eight million dollars
($8,000,000).  The lead applicant is the department or Kern Council
of Governments.
   (104) Route 99; build seven miles of new six-lane freeway south of
Merced, Buchanan Hollow Road to Healey Road in Merced County.  Five
million dollars ($5,000,000).  The lead applicant is the department
or the Merced County Association of Governments.
   (105) Route 99; build two miles of new six-lane freeway, Madera
County line to Buchanon Hollow Road in Merced County.  Five million
dollars ($5,000,000).  The lead applicant is the department or the
Merced County Association of Governments.
   (106) UC Merced access; build new arterial Campus Parkway to new
UC Merced campus in Merced County. Twenty-three million dollars
($23,000,000).  The lead applicant is the County of Merced.
   (107) Route 205; widen freeway to six lanes, Tracy to I-5 in San
Joaquin County.  Twenty-five million dollars ($25,000,000).  The lead
applicant is the department or the San Joaquin Council of
Governments.
   (108) Route 5; add northbound lane to freeway through Mossdale "Y"
, Route 205 to Route 120 in San Joaquin County.  Seven million
dollars ($7,000,000).  The lead applicant is the department or the
San Joaquin Council of Governments.
   (109) Route 132; build four miles of new four-lane expressway in
Modesto from Dakota Avenue to Route 99 and improve Route 99
Interchange in Stanislaus County.  Twelve million dollars
($12,000,000).  The lead applicant is the department or the
Stanislaus Council of Governments.
   (110) Route 132; build 3.5 miles of new four-lane expressway from
Route 33 to the San Joaquin county line in Stanislaus and San Joaquin
Counties.  Two million dollars ($2,000,000).  The lead applicant is
the department or the Stanislaus Council of Governments.
   (111) Route 198; build 10 miles of new four-lane expressway from
Route 99 to Hanford in Kings and Tulare Counties.  Fourteen million
dollars                                              ($14,000,000).
The lead applicant is the department or the Kings County Association
of Governments.
   (112) Jersey Avenue; widen from 170' Street to 18th Street in
Kings County.  One million five hundred thousand dollars
($1,500,000).  The lead applicant is Kings County.
   (113) Route 46; widen to four lanes for 33 miles from Route 5 to
San Luis Obispo County line in Kern County.  Thirty million dollars
($30,000,000).  The lead applicant is the department or the Kern
Council of Governments.
   (114) Route 65; add four passing lanes, intersection improvement,
and conduct environmental studies for ultimate widening to four lanes
from Route 99 in Bakersfield to Tulare County line in Kern County.
Twelve million dollars ($12,000,000).  The lead applicant is the
department or the Kern Council of Governments.
   (115) South Line Light Rail; extend South Line three miles towards
Elk Grove, from Meadowview Road to Calvine Road in Sacramento
County.  Seventy million dollars ($70,000,000).  The lead applicant
is the Sacramento Regional Transit District.
   (116) Route 80 Light Rail Corridor; double-track Route 80 light
rail line for express service in Sacramento County.  Twenty-five
million dollars ($25,000,000).  The lead applicant is the Sacramento
Regional Transit District.
   (117) Folsom Light Rail; extend Folsom light rail line six miles
to Iron Point Road and add three stations in Sacramento County.
Twenty million dollars ($20,000,000).  The lead applicant is the
Sacramento Regional Transit District.
   (118) Sacramento Emergency Clean Air/Transportation Plan (SECAT);
incentive for the reduction of emissions from heavy-duty diesel
engines operating within the Sacramento region.  Fifty million
dollars ($50,000,000).  The lead applicant is the Sacramento Area
Council of Governments.
   (119) Convert Sacramento Regional Transit bus fleet to low
emission and provide Yolobus service by the Yolo County
Transportation District; acquire approximately 50 replacement
low-emission buses for service in Sacramento and Yolo Counties.
Nineteen million dollars ($19,000,000).  The lead applicant is the
Sacramento Area Council of Governments and the Yolo County
Transportation District.
   (120) Yuba Airport facility runway extension and improvements to
reduce congestion.  One million five hundred thousand dollars
($1,500,000).  The lead applicant is the County of Yuba.
   (121) Metropolitan Bakersfield System Study; to reduce congestion
in the City of Bakersfield.  Three hundred fifty thousand dollars
($350,000).  The lead applicant is the Kern County Council of
Governments.
   (122) Route 65; widening project from 7th Standard Road to Route
190 in Porterville.  Three million five hundred thousand dollars
($3,500,000). The lead applicant is the County of Tulare.
   (123) Oceanside Transit Center; parking structure.  One million
five hundred thousand dollars ($1,500,000). The lead applicant is the
City of Oceanside.
   (125) Route 57; environmental impact report and study for
expansion project. Five million dollars ($5,000,000). The lead
applicant is the Orange County Transportation Authority.
   (126) Route 50/Watt Avenue interchange; widening of overcrossing
and modifications to interchange.  Seven million dollars
($7,000,000). The lead applicant is the County of Sacramento.
   (127) Route 85/Route 87; interchange completion; addition of two
direct connectors for southbound Route 85 to northbound Route 87 and
southbound Route 87 to northbound Route 85.  Three million five
hundred thousand dollars ($3,500,000). The lead applicant is the City
of San Jose.
   (128) Airport Road; reconstruction and intersection improvement
project.  Three million dollars ($3,000,000). The lead applicant is
the County of Shasta.
   (129) Route 62; utility undergrounding project in right-of-way of
Route 62.  Three million two hundred thousand dollars ($3,200,000).
The lead applicant is the Town of Yucca Valley.
   (130) Route 22; connector and widening of interchange with I-405
to reduce congestion.  Three million five hundred thousand dollars
($3,500,000).  The lead applicant is the City of Garden Grove.
   (131) Bear Valley Road; closure project and Kasota Road, Route 18
frontage; redesign for safety purposes.  Eight hundred thousand
dollars ($800,000).  The lead applicant is the Town of Apple Valley.

   (132) Fairway Drive; grade separation at Union Pacific railroad
project in San Gabriel Valley.  Seven million dollars ($7,000,000).
The lead applicant is the County of Los Angeles.
   (133) Feasibility studies for grade separation projects for Union
Pacific Railroad at Elk Grove Boulevard and Bond Road.  One hundred
fifty thousand dollars ($150,000).  The lead applicant is the City of
Elk Grove.
   (134) Route 50/Sunrise Boulevard; interchange modifications.
Three million dollars ($3,000,000). The lead applicant is the County
of Sacramento.
   (135) Route 99/Sheldon Road; interchange project; reconstruction
and expansion.  Three million dollars ($3,000,000).  The lead
applicant is the County of Sacramento.
   (136) Avenue S; widening between Route 14 and Route 138.  Three
million five hundred thousand dollars ($3,500,000). The lead
applicant is the City of Palmdale.
   (137) Fox Field Industrial Corridor;  gateway improvements;
widening of Route 14/Avenue H overcrossing.  Five million five
hundred thousand dollars ($5,500,000). The lead applicant is the City
of Lancaster.
   (138) Cross Valley Rail; upgrade track from Visalia to Huron.
Seven million dollars ($7,000,000).  The lead applicant is the Cross
Valley Rail Corridor Joint Powers Authority.
   (139) Balboa Park BART Station; phase I expansion.  Six million
dollars ($6,000,000).  The lead applicant is the San Francisco Bay
Area Rapid Transit District.
   (140) City of Goshen; overpass for Route 99.  One million five
hundred thousand dollars ($1,500,000).  The lead applicant is the
department.
   (141) Union City; pedestrian bridge over Union Pacific rail lines.
  Two million dollars ($2,000,000).  The lead applicant is the City
of Union City.
   (142) West Hollywood; repair, maintenance, and mitigation of Santa
Monica Boulevard.  Three million five hundred thousand dollars
($3,500,000).  The lead applicant is the City of West Hollywood.
   (143) Capital Corridor; expand intercity rail service.  One
million nine hundred thousand dollars ($1,900,000).  The lead
applicant is the Capital Corridor Joint Powers Authority.
   (144) Seismic retrofit of the national landmark Golden Gate
Bridge.  Fifty million dollars ($50,000,000).  The lead applicant is
the Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and Transportation District.
   (145) Construction of a new siding in Sun Valley between Sheldon
Street and Sunland Boulevard.  Six million five hundred thousand
dollars ($6,500,000).  The lead applicant is the Southern California
Regional Rail Authority.
   (146) Construction of Palm Drive Interchange.  Ten million dollars
($10,000,000).  The lead applicant is the Coachella Valley
Association of Governments.
   (147) Project development work for the reconstruction of the
I-8/Imperial Avenue interchange.  Seven million dollars ($7,000,000).
  The lead applicant is the Imperial Valley Association of
Governments.
   (148) Route 98; widening of 8 miles between Route 111 and Route 7
from two lanes to 4 lanes.  Ten million dollars ($10,000,000).  The
lead applicant is the department.
   (149) Purchase of low-emission buses for express service on Route
17.  Three million seven hundred fifty thousand dollars ($3,750,000).
  The lead applicant is the Santa Cruz Metropolitan Transit District.

   (150) Renovation or rehabilitation of Santa Cruz Metro Center.
One million dollars ($1,000,000).  The lead applicant is the Santa
Cruz Metropolitan Transit District.
   (151) Purchase of 5 alternative fuel buses for the Pasadena Area
Rapid Transit System.  One million one hundred thousand dollars
($1,100,000).  The lead applicant is the Pasadena Area Rapid Transit
System.
   (152) Pasadena Blue Line transit-oriented mixed-use development.
One million five hundred thousand dollars ($1,500,000).  The lead
applicant is the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation
Authority of the City of South Pasadena.
   (153) Pasadena Blue Line utility relocation.  Five hundred fifty
thousand dollars ($550,000).  The lead applicant is the City of South
Pasadena.
   (154) Route 135/I-5 interchange study.  One hundred thousand
dollars ($100,000).  The lead applicant is the department.
   (155) City of Chula Vista; (A) at its option, to acquire
right-of-way, build, and operate a 10-mile limited access toll
facility from San Miguel Road to Otay Mesa Road.  Eight million six
hundred thousand dollars ($8,600,000).  (B) Of the amount specified,
five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) shall be immediately
available to the City of Chula Vista for the purpose of conducting a
due diligence review, including an independent appraisal of the
feasibility of acquisition by a public agency of the Route 125
franchise agreement authorized under Section 143 of the Streets and
Highways Code.  The lead applicant is the City of Chula Vista.
   (156) Seismic retrofit and core segment improvements for the Bay
Area Rapid Transit system.  Twenty million dollars ($20,000,000).
The lead applicant is the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit
District.
   (157) Route 12;  Congestion relief improvements from Route 29 to
I-80 through Jamison Canyon.  Seven million dollars ($7,000,000).
The lead applicant is the department.
   (158) Remodel the intersection of Olympic Boulevard and Lemon
Street and install a new traffic signal.  Two million dollars
($2,000,000).  The lead applicant is the City of Los Angeles.
   (159) Route 101; redesign and construction of Steele Lane
interchange.  Six million dollars ($6,000,000).  The lead applicant
is the department or the Sonoma County Transportation Authority.
   (b) As used in this section "route" is a state highway route as
identified in Article 3 (commencing with Section 300) of Chapter 2 of
Division 1 of the Streets and Highways Code.
